Uso do Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) na residência médica: uma revisão de escopo / Use of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in medical residency: a scoping review

Resumo Introdução: Com a evolução do ensino médico para currículos baseados em competências, fez-se necessária uma readequação dos currículos e dos métodos de avaliação, com maior enfoque sobre o cenário de prática profissional e, portanto, na utilização de ferramentas como o Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX). Objetivo: Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o uso da estratégia Mini-CEX como método de avaliação nos programas de residência médica. Método: Trata-se de uma revisão de escopo, cuja estratégia de busca realizada no PubMed resultou em 578 artigos. Após aplicar a metodologia do Instituto Joanna Briggs para inclusão e exclusão, foram selecionados 24 estudos transversais. Resultado: Selecionaram-se artigos referentes a estudos realizados entre 1995 e 2021, em diversos continentes, diferentes programas de residência, e cenários ambulatorial, internação e de emergência. O Mini-CEX mostrou-se aplicável no contexto da residência médica, pois trata-se de uma avaliação observacional direta do atendimento realizado pelo médico residente nos diversos cenários de atuação, como ambulatórios, internações e emergências. Trata-se de uma avaliação com tempo de observação variando de dez a 40 minutos e que permite a abordagem de vários aspectos do atendimento médico, como anamnese, exame físico, raciocínio clínico e aconselhamento, além de possibilitar a realização de um feedback sobre o desempenho dos residentes. Conclusão: O Mini-CEX constitui uma ferramenta de fácil aplicabilidade e promove alto grau de satisfação dos envolvidos, podendo ser utilizada de forma rotineira nos programas de residência médica.

Abstract Introduction: With the evolution of medical education towards competency-based curriculum, the need has emerged to reconfigure curriculum and assessment methods, with increased focus on the professional practice setting, thus leading to the utilization of tools such as the mini-CEX (mini-Clinical Evaluation Exam). Objective: To evaluate the use of the mini-CEX strategy as an assessment method in medical residency programs. Method: This is a scoping review, and the search performed on PubMed resulted in 578 articles. After applying the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for inclusion and exclusion, 24 cross-sectional studies were selected. Results: The selected articles were based on studies conducted between 1995 and 2021, in various continents and in both clinical and surgical residency programs, including outpatient, inpatient, and emergency settings. The Mini-CEX was shown to be applicable in the context of medical residency, as it is an observational assessment of the care provided by the resident physician in various practice settings such as outpatient clinics, inpatient wards, and emergency departments. It involves a variable observation time ranging from 10 to 40 minutes and allows for the evaluation of various aspects of medical care, including history taking, physical examination, clinical reasoning, counseling, and provides an opportunity for providing feedback on the residents' performance. Conclusion: The mini-CEX is a tool that is easy to implement and promotes a high degree of satisfaction among stakeholders. It could be used more routinely in medical residency programs.

Is maxillomandibular advancement an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea? Systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of maxillomandibular advancement surgery in the treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea by comparing the pre- and postoperative Apnea and Hypopnea Index, in addition to classifying the degree of evidence and risk of intervention bias. Methods A systematic review of the literature was carried out in the PUBMED, LILACS, EMBASE, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE and COCHRANE platforms, including cohort studies with polysomnographic follow-up, without other associated pharyngeal or nasal surgical procedures. The risk of study bias was assessed using the Modified Delphi technique. Pre- and postoperative Apnea and Hypopnea Index data were plotted for meta-analysis, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. Results Of 1882 references, 32 articles were selected for full-text reading, of which four studies were included, totaling 83 adults with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent maxillomandibular advancement. The meta-analysis was in favor of the intervention (DM = −33.36, 95% CI −41.43 to −25.29, p< 0.00001), with a mean percentage reduction in the Apnea and Hypopnea Index of 79.5% after surgery, even though the level of evidence was classified as very low quality by the GRADE system. Conclusion The meta-analysis was in favor of the intervention, characterizing maxillomandibular advancement surgery as an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in adults.

Is maxillomandibular advancement an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea? Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of maxillomandibular advancement surgery in the treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea by comparing the pre- and postoperative Apnea and Hypopnea Index, in addition to classifying the degree of evidence and risk of intervention bias. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out in the PUBMED, LILACS, EMBASE, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE and COCHRANE platforms, including cohort studies with polysomnographic follow-up, without other associated pharyngeal or nasal surgical procedures. The risk of study bias was assessed using the Modified Delphi technique. Pre- and postoperative Apnea and Hypopnea Index data were plotted for meta-analysis, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. RESULTS: Of 1882 references, 32 articles were selected for full-text reading, of which four studies were included, totaling 83 adults with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent maxillomandibular advancement. The meta-analysis was in favor of the intervention (DM = -33.36, 95% CI -41.43 to -25.29, p < 0.00001), with a mean percentage reduction in the Apnea and Hypopnea Index of 79.5% after surgery, even though the level of evidence was classified as very low quality by the GRADE system. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis was in favor of the intervention, characterizing maxillomandibular advancement surgery as an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in adults.

Risk of ageism in the use of cost-effectiveness thresholds in the recommendations of the national commission for incorporation of technologies in the Brazilian Unified Health System / Risco de idadismo no uso de limiares de custo-efetividade nas recomendações da comissão nacional de incorporações de tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde no Brasil

Government agencies perform health technology assessment when evaluating requests to incorporate technologies in public health systems. To promote participation in this decisionmaking process, the National Commission for the Incorporation of Technologies in the Unified Health System (CONITEC) makes its recommendations available for public consultation for 20 days, which may occasionally be reduced or extended. Recently, CONITEC published its recommendations about the use of cost-effectiveness thresholds in health care decisionmaking. When reviewing the criteria for alternative cost-effectiveness thresholds, given that they promote innovation and equity in the Brazilian Unified Health System, we realized that the criterion "diseases affecting individuals at the end of life" was excluded from the list. This viewpoint article is a request for CONITEC to reconsider this position. The report disregards technical aspects related to the use of quality-adjusted life years as a metric in patients with low life expectancy, indicating the potential to discriminate against older adults and ignore the practical considerations of international organizations on this topic.

A avaliação de tecnologias em saúde (ATS) subsidia as agências governamentais voltadas à avaliação dos pedidos de incorporação de tecnologias junto aos seus respectivos sistemas públicos de saúde. Para promover a participação da sociedade no processo de tomada de decisão para a incorporação de novas tecnologias, a Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde (CONITEC) disponibiliza suas recomendações em consulta pública por um prazo de 20 dias, que pode ser excepcionalmente reduzido ou estendido. Recentemente, a CONITEC disponibilizou para consulta pública suas recomendações sobre o uso de Limiar de Cursto-Efetividade (LCE) nas decisões em saúde. Ao revisar os critérios previamente considerados no início das discussões sobre contextos passíveis de LCE alternativos, por promoverem a inovação e equidade em saúde para o Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), percebemos que o critério "doenças acometendo indivíduos no final da expectativa de vida" foi excluído da lista de critérios de flexibilização. Este artigo de ponto de vista discute o pedido de reconsideração enviado à CONITEC para que a posição seja revista. O entendimento expresso no relatório desconsidera aspectos técnicos relacionados ao uso do QALY como métrica em pacientes com baixa expectativa de vida, além disso, tem potencial discriminatório em relação à população geriátrica e ignora considerações práticas de órgãos internacionais em relação ao tema.

Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pasireotide, cabergoline, ketoconazole, levoketoconazole, metyrapone, osilodrostat, and temozolomide for the treatment of Cushing's disease (CD). Methods: The primary outcomes were the proportion of CD control, adverse events (AE), and reduction of urinary free cortisol. Search strategies were applied to Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL. Independent reviewers assessed the study eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Standardized mean difference was calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data (i.e., pre- and post-intervention). Random meta-analyses for the proportion of CD control and AE were conducted. Results: Twenty-nine controlled and non-controlled studies were included. No study with temozolomide and levoketoconazole and one study with osilodrostat fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The meta-analyses of proportion of CD control was 35% for cabergoline (95% CI: 27-43%, six studies, 141 participants), 44% for pasireotide (95% CI: 25-35%, eight studies, 522 participants), 41% for ketoconazole (95% CI: 36-46%, six studies, 450 participants), 66% for metyrapone (95% CI: 46-87%, four studies, 66 participants), and of 66.4% for osilodrostat (95% CI: 57.9, 74.3, 97 participants, one study). One study compared two different treatments (cabergoline vs. ketoconazole), and no statistical difference was observed in CD control (RR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.15 to 1.87, 14 participants, very low certainty of evidence). The most frequent AE associated with pasireotide was hyperglycemia, dizziness and nausea with cabergoline and metyrapone, and elevated transaminases with ketoconazole. Conclusion: The superiority of one drug over another could not be determined due to lack of controlled studies, but the proportion of disease control identified in our meta-analysis may support clinical decision. New therapeutic options should be investigated due to the limited efficacy and tolerability of the currently available medical treatment for patients with Cushing's disease. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020205567, identifier CRD42020205567.

Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in gestational diabetes mellitus: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Trials have examined on the benefits of vitamin D supplementation in pregnant women. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to evaluate whether oral vitamin D supplements, when given to pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), would improve maternal and neonatal outcomes, compared with no treatment or placebo. METHOD: We performed a systematic review following Cochrane methodology, and randomized trials were included where pregnant women with GDM received vitamin D supplementation versus placebo/no treatment or vitamin D and calcium versus placebo/no treatment. Primary outcomes were preeclampsia, preterm birth, cesarean delivery, gestational hypertension, and adverse events related to vitamin D supplementation. The search strategies were applied to the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and CENTRAL. Similar outcomes in at least two trials were plotted using Review Manager 5.3 software. The quality of evidence was generated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: The total of 1224 references were identified, eleven trials were potentially eligible, and six were included in this review (totaling 456 women). The meta-analysis of frequency of cesarean deliveries did not show significant differences between groups, none of the trials evaluated the remaining primary outcomes. For secondary outcomes, our results suggest that vitamin D supplementation in pregnant women with GDM may reduce newborn complications such as hyperbilirubinemia, polyhydramnios (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.68; RR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.89; respectively), and the need for maternal or infant hospitalization (RR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.98; RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.69). However, the evidence was of low or very low quality. CONCLUSION: We did not find moderate or high quality evidence indicating that vitamin D supplementation, when compared with placebo, improves glucose metabolism, adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes related to GDM in pregnant women.